Last night, the Lakers won the championship in the most anticlimactic game in the most anticlimactic Finals of all time. Basically, this postseason was a Dan Brown book. Fun and full of intrigue throughout the first three quarters, but it just falls apart at the end and becomes a series of cliches, with plot hole after plot hole. I wouldn’t be surprised if Tom Hanks was running around with some Cuban ingenue underneath Amway Arena during Game 5 questioning the religious symbology of Gloria Estefan’s “The Rhythm Is Gonna Get You” and comparing that to the Masonic undertones of Cinderella’s Castle at Disney World. I digress.
The Lakers won it all last night. Let’s take a look at their lineup and see what a championship team looks like.
PG: An older, and by some accounts washed-up, PG who has a knack for the big shot. A veteran who can play good defense and makes solid decisions on the court.
SG: Arguably the best SG alive.
SF: A headcase full of unrealized talent.
PF: A skilled big man that man have called “soft.”
C: A foul-prone young man that never made as big a difference, be it positive or negative, as anyone hoped he would.
The Bench:
A young and physical defensive player that doesn’t shy from the big shot.
A workmanlike backup guard that is mostly known for his intelligence.
A crowd favorite young big-man that is known for a strong work ethic.
A bust of a small forward that has become a joke in his short career.
A role player that is both better than he should be yet still never lives up to what some thought he could be.
The most hated hair in the NBA and a strong outside shooter.
Assorted scraps.
Your 2009 Champions, the Los Angeles Lakers.
I will grant you, these descriptions are very brief and they may omit some of the more subtle nuances about some of these players, but I feel they boil the players down to their essences. What’s funny is how much these essences match those of our Blazers. They can also, perhaps, point out some of our own needs and deficiencies.
The best shooting guard alive description can apply at times to one of our own. The soft and skilled power forward description as well. Unfortunately, the foul-prone young center too. Also, we have our share of assorted scraps.
Where we differ, however, could be what separates us from being championship caliber. We don’t have the defensive stopper veteran point guard. Blake is a veteran and can run the team, but he can’t do everything. Trevor Ariza is everything that we hoped Travis Outlaw could be. He uses his size and his length to bother the other team while still scoring and picking his spots, even if he is a SOB. What’s intriguing is the idea of the head case small forward kept in line by the great shooting guard. That part of the formula can get fulfilled this summer if we want it to happen.
Of course, there are also categories where we can and may have already surpassed the Lakers too. Rudy’s better than the hated hair. Martell and Batum are better options than Walton. Przybilla is leagues ahead of Mbenga. Theoretically, Bayless may end up better than Farmar.
Still, these guys have a ring, and we don’t. There’s been a lot of talk this offseason as to what the Blazers should do and shouldn’t do. Sometimes it’s good to look at a case study and actually see what works. It’s reassuring to know we are so close to being where the Lakers are, yet distressing to know that yes, we have a few steps (be it through trades or experience) to take to become a championship team.